Alaska delegation introduces bills to curb states bans on walrus ivory

first_imgAn ivory walrus on display at Maruskiya’s in Nome. (Photo by Emily Russell, KNOM – Nome).Alaska’s Congressman and Senators have introduced legislation in the U.S. House and Senate to preempt states from banning walrus ivory, whale bone and other marine mammal products. Through these new bills, the delegation has proposed amending the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). Vera Metcalf, the director of the Eskimo Walrus Commission, says this is a step in the right direction.“For us, there’s really no way to address the consequences of the ivory ban at the state level and I’m glad they (the delegation) are moving forward with introducing this legislation that might get us moving and working more to educate the general public about what walrus ivory is to our communities and why it is important to not include it in the ivory ban,” she said.The need for this legislation came about when almost 10 states, the most recent being Illinois, passed state bans on some or all types of ivory which included the resource Alaska Native carvers use for their livelihood. Originally these state restrictions were put into effect in response to the U.S.’s near-total ban on commercial trade of elephant ivory in 2016.In an announcement from Alaska’s representatives earlier this month, Sen. Dan Sullivan said these craftsmen have been attacked by “numerous states banning the sale of sustainable arts made of walrus and mammoth ivory and other marine mammal products legally allowed under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, unnecessarily coupling them with the illicit sale of poached elephant ivory.”During a recent visit to St. Lawrence Island, local carvers told Metcalf that the inconsistency among state’s ivory bans has been negatively affecting their sales.“I’ve heard people say, ‘Well it’s getting harder for me to sell ivory because of this fear (in) people that buy walrus ivory, arts and crafts.’ I think there is fear of potential prosecution because I think each state has different information,” she said.The Alaska delegation says its legislation aims to end the confusion created by other states’ laws and protect Native artisans who work with ivory. Metcalf agrees more needs to be done to protect Alaska Native ivory carvers.While these two new bills go through Congress, Metcalf says she and her working group will continue to spread the message that the walrus population is healthy and does not warrant listing under the Endangered Species Act.The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service made that determination in October of 2017, so now the species will continue to be protected under the MMPA for Alaska Natives to sustainably harvest.“I mean we certainly promote non-wasteful takes and we have been sending this message but also using all of what is given to us, including the ivory, is very much a part of our communities using the resource for food and ivory for making beautiful handicrafts and art,” Metcalf said.According to the state delegation, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to restrict the take of marine mammals if the population is dwindling, but the secretary must also have evidence to demonstrate that.For more information on legal Alaska Native ivory carvings made with walrus or other marine mammal products, check out the Eskimo Walrus Commission’s brochure.last_img read more

France probes Apple over iPhone planned obsolescence complaint

first_imgFrench authorities are investigating whether Apple deliberately slows down older iPhones in order to increase sales, AFP reports.The move follows a complaint by a French consumer group, HOP, that campaigns against planned obsolescence and which filed a complaint against Apple in December.Programmed obsolescence is illegal in France under a 2015 law which prohibits “the use of techniques by which the person responsible for the marketing of a product aims to deliberately reduce the duration to increase the replacement rate “.The law carries a penalty of a maximum sentence of two years in prison and up to 5 per cent of a company’s annual turnover.AFP cites a judicial source stating that the Paris prosecutor’s office of the Directorate General of Competition, Consumption and Repression of Frauds opened a preliminary investigation against Apple on January 5, for “programmed obsolescence” and “deception”.We’ve contacted Apple for comment and will update this story with any response.In December Apple responded publicly to complaints that it throttles performance on older iPhones, saying it was managing performance in order to prolong the life of devices by avoiding unexpected shutdowns caused by older batteries not being able to handle peaks of processing power.It subsequently apologized for not being more transparent about how it handles performance on iPhones with older batteries — writing in a message to customers that “we have never — and would never — do anything to intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades”, and saying its goal is to make “iPhones last as long as possible”.It also began offering a battery replacement for affected older devices for a reduced $29.In a statement, Laetitia Vasseur, HOP co-founder and general delegate, said: “Everything is orchestrated to force consumers to renew their smartphones. However, at more than €1,200 the phone, more than a SMIC [minimum monthly wage], these practices are unacceptable and can not go unpunished. It is our mission to defend consumers and the environment against this waste organized by Apple.”In its campaigning against programmed obsolescence, the HOP group also calls generally for greater transparency from companies and for software updates to be reversible, as well as urging smartphone makers to offer devices with removable batteries.last_img read more